Many examples nowadays which are found online use Dyalog operators and syntax extensions to understand the differences refer to this discussion of APL "evolution" or "migration" levels and how they affect the meaning of certain operators: Mix (up arrow) in GNU APL? Those who are studying APL would do well to contrast GNU APL with Dyalog APL, a proprietary implementation that is actively developed by its namesake company, which has diverged from APL2 in some respects. For a wonderful introduction to APL2, refer to APL2 At A Glance, by Brown, Pakin & Polivka. In general, it follows IBM's APL2 implementation.
#Gnucash account code full
a GTK3 interface for plotting and even building full UI applications in APL. structured variables and associative arrays
#Gnucash account code iso
GNU APL is an (almost) complete implementation of ISO standard 13751 aka. You can do this by using Reply-To-List or Reply-All.GNU APL is a cross platform APL (APL2) interpreter. Please remember to CC this list on all your replies. Request/suggestions/1568131-provide-per-transaction-cancel-of-autofill-with. Feelįree to add your ideas to this suggestion and vote for it. > whether the given Memo always goes to the same account, or often goesīoth of your requests are a variant of a suggestion on uservoice. > When considering whether to default the account, GnuCash should check > GnuCash often assumes the wrong account and enters it for me. > charges split into different subaccounts. > case for my bank, for which I have the different kinds of bank service > But some of my Memo entries require different accounts. > field is going to be and enters it for me. > same account, so it is fine that GnuCash assumes what the Account > Most of my transactions that have a given Memo entry always go to the
On zaterdag 8 oktober 2011, Don Quixote de la Mancha wrote: *Subject:* Spam:****, Re: Account Should Not Always Be Assumed For A Given Memo Most of the reports I have seen have an option to show the account code. > For that matter, I don_t think any reports show account codes If the feature is absolutely essential to you then Gnucash is probably not for you! I would guess that any feature suggested now is unlikely to be implemented within the next year or so. You can make this, and other proposals, at - and if the proposal gets enough votes it may even be implemented one day! Whatever happens, though, you will have to resign yourself to a lengthy wait. That said, I do understand that others, like yourself, may need a fully unique list of account codes, and there is a good case to made for a configurable option to enforce uniqueness on the account codes list - but *ONLY* as a configurable option!!! :-) If uniqueness were enforced then blank codes would be considered duplicates and thus outlawed, and being obliged to use a full list would completely undermine its usefulness for me!
However, I only have a sparse list of such codes - I simply couldn't remember a full list, and for the remaining accounts I simply pick them from the list. My use for the account_code field is as a shorthand for my frequently used account names when entering transactions. Different users have different needs! :-) The separate "account_code" field we are given is available for you to use (or not) as you choose. > be unique _ that kind of defeats the purpose.Īs I've said before, if you want a "unique_account_code", there is already one there should you choose to use it. > I_m quite surprised that GnuCash doesn_t force the account codes to
0 kommentar(er)
